In the pursuit of justice, the courtroom's decorum is not merely a tradition; it is a reflection of respect, professionalism, and transparency. As vigilant citizens, we have the right and responsibility to ensure these standards are upheld, for the integrity of our judicial system is a cornerstone of our democracy. Having recently attended a session at Blacktown Local Court, I found the experience to be disconcerting, primarily due to the lack of decorum and professionalism exhibited by court officials. The proceedings were rife with distractions and an unsettling lack of respect for the judicial process. The most distressing aspect was the conduct of the police prosecutor. Rather than maintaining the solemnity and respectfulness expected in such a setting, he carried on with side conversations, seemingly oblivious to the proceedings at hand. The courtroom often felt more akin to his personal office than a court of law. Despite being reprimanded by Magistrate Maher, the prosecutor continued his unprofessional behavior, causing further disruptions. A particularly distressing incident involved a female litigant who voiced her inability to follow the proceedings due to the continuous side conversations. The prosecutor's response was dismissive and disrespectful. Not only did he ignore her concerns, but he also made a vulgar gesture in full view of the public gallery. This fist-pumping action, a universally recognized sign of disrespect, was shockingly inappropriate for the courtroom. Despite these concerns being brought to the attention of Magistrate Maher, there was a noticeable lack of interest or action taken to address the prosecutor's behavior. This lack of response only served to further undermine the integrity of the proceedings and question the commitment to justice and fairness within this court and its independence. This experience was deeply disheartening. A courtroom should embody respect, decorum, and professionalism - qualities that were distinctly lacking during this session. The prosecutor's behavior was not only disrespectful to the litigants but also to the public and the institution of the court itself. It's 2023, and one would hope that our judicial system has come a long way since the 1920s, especially in terms of respect and equality for all individuals, regardless of their background. However, the behavior displayed in Blacktown Local Court was a grim reminder that there is still a considerable way to go. Changes are urgently needed to ensure that everyone in the courtroom respects the judicial process and adheres to the standards of decorum that are vital for justice to be served. One can only hope that this review can act as a catalyst for such change. Indeed, members of the public attending court proceedings do have the right, and arguably the responsibility, to bring any disturbing or inappropriate behavior to the attention of the court officials. Public courtrooms exist within the realm of public service, and the behavior of individuals within them should reflect this understanding. Transparency, respect, and accountability are fundamental pillars of any judicial system. Members of the public, as observers and recipients of these services, have a stake in their effective and respectful delivery. Therefore, when a member of the public notices behavior that contradicts the expected decorum, they should not only be allowed but also encouraged to report this. In the case of the Blacktown Local Court, the lack of attention or action taken in response to a public complaint was disheartening. It not only perpetuated the inappropriate behavior but also undermined public trust in the judicial process. The public’s ability to question and challenge these behaviors is crucial for maintaining the integrity and accountability of the Justice system.

Where justice goes to die. Courts are incompetent and in our case made every conceivable effort to make it harder and costlier for us to get our money back from someone who blatantly stole our money and avoided attending court. Because of how terrible our system is, she has got away scott free scamming many people.

Absolutely impossible to find free parking over two hours. Could not see information about parking on website. If you are summoned for jury duty, expect to walk.

Court staff were examplarily courteous and magistrate was clear and concise. Got sentenced to 25 years for internet privacy. Always buy CDs!

There is not a JP or a authorised person of the court at the court house to witness documents for the public. Bloody hopeless.

Starting to be too busy to cope. There’s no room to expand if an extra court were needed

This place needs its own car park ffs.

Chairs are horrible

It’s a court.

Dogs